My carreer

I'm not so sure you can know why exactly you have chosen anything. So it's surely not true what I belive: that I chose Psychology because there was Lacan in it. I know well it's not true but I also think that I didn't chose Psychology the day I matriculated on it, but, in a sense, very recently in third grade after reading him. So best thing is Lacan, and by Lacan I mean psychoanalysis in general and critical thought and marxism (and all the things one could inscribe in this series on non common sensical, non-social reproductive, thought).

So you can see this last element would be the worst of it for me: Common sensical abundance when it comes to think the subjectivity or the psychological problems.

But for common sense, I think, we already have common sense, we don't need a second, academically legitimated, verbally reformulated, common sense. Why would we want this? Why, if not for the social function it might fulfill?

And that's why I chose it and what I like and dislike about it.